posted by Doyle
I did a post a while back made of of Twitter posts (Tweets, for you Twitter users!) from Adweek’s Brian Morrissey. For the most part, he’s spot on when he talks about the PR profession. But not long ago he posted this on Twitter:
Why don’t PR firms establish a site where reporters/bloggers can state contact pref (ie, no phone calls) and firms agree to honor?
Honestly, the good PR people figure this out without such a site. Reporter preferences are available in many databases, but the best way to figure things out is to ask. That’s just how business works — no one wants to irritate the people they’re trying to do business with.
But Brian, I have to disagree on this one because you made it a one-way street. It’s not one-way and it simply can’t be. Like you, PR people have a job to do. There are good reporters, and there are bad reporters, just as there are good PR professionals, and there bad ones — those that make the job harder for all of us. In the end, I’m sure there are PR professionals you not only don’t mind hearing from, but that you look forward to hearing from, as they bring you good story ideas and treat you with professional respect.
That’s where the two-way street comes in: we need some professional respect in return. If all of us make it a two-way street, it can make all of our jobs more efficient and make our relationships more beneficial all the way around.
For example, let’s say that you only want to be contacted via email, and I honor that. I send you a pitch, and I never hear back. Should I just assume you got it but you’re not interested? Isn’t it possible it didn’t go through, that it got caught in a spam filter or got buried in a too-full inbox? That happens to all of us. Just how far do you think I’d get with my clients if my standard answer was “Gee, I sent an email, but I never heard back. I guess he wasn’t interested.” I guess? I’ve had many reporter say to me, “Thanks for following up… I didn’t get your email.”
Let me turn that same scenario back to you: does your editor let you off the hook when you need information, confirmation or a quote, and you tell him/her “Gee, I sent an email, but the guy never got back to me. Guess we can’t run the story.”
Somehow, I doubt that’s the response that landed you writing for Adweek.
In the end, we face many of the same challenges, you and me. If I can tell a client “Got an email from Brian Morrissey, and he’s not interested” it allows me to move on, give an answer and maybe do my job better. If three reporters who all seem to be good targets tell me “no thanks,” I can counsel my client that the story isn’t working, or the pitch is off, or it’s old news, etc. Without some feedback, it’s hard to know what the problem is — from an overworked reporter to an off-target pitch, bad story or an overactive spam filter.
If reporters didn’t ever use anything from PR people, the industry wouldn’t exist. Reporters wouldn’t participate in services like Peter Shankman’s “Help A Reporter Out.” I wouldn’t have reporters who welcome my calls, because I bring them good ideas. No reporters would ever call me looking for story ideas (and they do). In the end, I’d have to do something different for a living.
To answer your original question, good PR professionals DO try to keep track of how reporters like to be contacted. Sometimes we miss, and sometimes we guess wrong when we start a relationship with a new reporter. But we try, and we welcome input. But we need feedback to get better.
So here’s my serious offer: I’ll start a Wiki at Metzger Associates on which any reporter can post their contact preferences. But in addition to those preferences, anyone who posts must also agree to adhere to a few requests. Specifically:
- If we pitch you in your preferred way, you have to acknowledge the pitch with at least a “no thank you” so we can move forward and know our pitch wasn’t lost.
- If you don’t say “no thanks,” we can follow up outside of your preferred method of contact.
- If we ask you to schedule time, you’ll spend a couple of minutes on the phone or in an email helping us understand how to refine our pitches to better meet your needs.
I’ll build the Wiki if you’ll help us out. Let me know! Thanks, Brian!
3 responses so far ↓
1 Stephen Ludwig // Oct 10, 2008 at 12:52 am
I love reporters, I really do. They are generally smart, well read, very interesting.
But, they have a tendency to whine on ocassion. And this constant bitching about PR people is laughable. With news staffing at all time lows, where do reporters turn when they are on a tight deadline and need something now and can't find it on the Internet? PR people.
So, reporters, take the good with the bad and be very happy that you get to write and report for a living. What a great professon you have. And, if you have to deal with some of my PR colleagues that are dolts, well, I don't think that's too high a price to pay.
2 bmorrissey // Oct 10, 2008 at 7:58 am
Hi Doyle,
I promised myself to stop talking about PR. It’s not something I’m super-interested in figuring out. Ok, one final time… I’ve expressed frustrations with how PR is practiced from my POV. Maybe other reporters are different. Beats me. I realize it probably won’t change. Companies will continue to hire PR firms to pimp their wares. Those firms will still find it more efficient to send mass emails and have low-level people do mass follow-up calls. It doesn’t matter whether I tell one of those PR database people who make money off selling my information that I don’t want phone calls. It won’t matter if I’m on a wiki. That’s just the way it is.
One thing I’ll dispute until I leave this profession: My job isn’t to help PR people do a better job for their clients. It isn’t to help them craft pitches. It isn’t to chat with them on the phone about their clients. It isn’t to do “media audits.” It isn’t to spend a good chunk of my day responding to each of the 150+ mass-blast emails I’m sent. This wasn’t mentioned in my job interviews, isn’t a part of my reviews, and isn’t something I care to do. If there’s a problem with how the PR industry operates, I’ll leave it to people like you and Shankman to sort it out.
3 Doyle // Oct 10, 2008 at 8:12 am
Brian:
Despite not wanting to be drawn in, you’re right again — your job is not to help PR people do a better job. Your job is to report. Part of reporting, however, is to find and develop sources. If you wrote a crime beat for a local paper, you’d know which members of the police force were good sources and which were clueless. At the same time, things on the crime beat happen out in the open — reporters can show up at the scene of a crime.
Much of your beat, however, happens behind closed doors. The final product is very public, but we can all see that. The story is often the why or why not that went in to the development, and to get to that, you’re often going to need to talk to people like me. And, I’m the first to admit, some PR people are better than others. Some are really good sources, and I’ll believe that until I leave this profession.
As always, Brian, thanks for weighing in. I won’t drag you back in to the conversation anytime soon, I promise.
And, I don’t have to spend the weekend building a wiki!
Doyle
You must log in to post a comment.