<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third parties douse flames in comment section</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metzgerblog.com/2009/06/09/third-parties-douse-flames-in-comment-section/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metzgerblog.com/2009/06/09/third-parties-douse-flames-in-comment-section/</link>
	<description>Observations on social media -- and the occasional rant -- from Metzger Associates' New Media Practice Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.metzgerblog.com/2009/06/09/third-parties-douse-flames-in-comment-section/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metzgerblog.com/?p=508#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Alexis:
Thanks for the response. I can see how your reporter would be peeved. The temptation to &quot;stuff the ballot box&quot; has to be a big one; relationships with your valued media contacts are — as you illustrated — one of the best reasons for total transparency when jumping into a thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexis:<br />
Thanks for the response. I can see how your reporter would be peeved. The temptation to &#8220;stuff the ballot box&#8221; has to be a big one; relationships with your valued media contacts are — as you illustrated — one of the best reasons for total transparency when jumping into a thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis Anzalone</title>
		<link>http://www.metzgerblog.com/2009/06/09/third-parties-douse-flames-in-comment-section/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis Anzalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metzgerblog.com/?p=508#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, and such a tough call to make.   
 
I&#039;ve been on the end of finding out that a client is pretending to be a different person in order to post &quot;positive&quot; comments on their own story; and just recently I was staffing an interview with the WSJ in which the reporter was pretty upset with the comments on his own story - because he could tell PR people had gotten involved.   
 
I agree with your approach to wait - patience is a virture in most cases like this.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, and such a tough call to make.   </p>
<p>I&#039;ve been on the end of finding out that a client is pretending to be a different person in order to post &quot;positive&quot; comments on their own story; and just recently I was staffing an interview with the WSJ in which the reporter was pretty upset with the comments on his own story &#8211; because he could tell PR people had gotten involved.   </p>
<p>I agree with your approach to wait &#8211; patience is a virture in most cases like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
